joshhansen.net

Blog

  • The Hulk: Incredible?

    Just saw The Incredible Hulk for free due to the generosity of a friend of a friend (that’s FOAF for short, no joke). Interesting movie, better than it might have been, yet not exactly a great feat of cinema. Here are some observations:

    • I guess it’s the linguist in me, but I really enjoyed watching Bruce Banner navigate through Brazil, Guatemala, and Mexico. My portuguese is pretty bad, though 🙁
    • Another super-hero in New York City? Well, maybe that’s just a tradition of superherodom. That other Bruce, Bruce Wayne, managed to live elsewhere and still find plenty to do, but then again, he didn’t need any super powers either.
    • I genuinely liked the main character and admired his efforts to keep from turning into a monster. The echoes of Jekyll and Hyde are pretty obvious, but I related to the guy on a different level: his struggles reminded me of the incredible disruptions that have come into my life as a result of panic and anxiety attacks. You do what you can to try to avoid an “episode,” but sometimes there is no avoiding it. Then, once it passes, you’re left in somewhat of a shambles. So it was with Mr. Banner.
    • The movie had tons of product placement, which was sort of annoying. Films that do that in intrusive ways make me wonder why the creators of the movie are hedging their bets against its financial success at the ticket office.
    • The Incredible Hulk sadly resorts to some pretty stale clichés, e.g. the unorthodox branch of the military doing twisted experiments on people; the obsessed commando villain who will stop at nothing; the mad scientist. If I was a military man I’d probably be insulted by the portrayal of the armed forces as having absolutely no limits, no rules of engagement, but a commander who looks suspiciously like Josef Stalin and who is called “The General” ordering people via radio to pump the green beast full of lead. And like a university would just roll over and let the unprincipled nasty army dudes hold a super-powered firefight on their campus. The only time I know of that the military goes in force to schools is when they’re escorting black children into newly desegregated schools in Alabama, and that’s only when the president orders them to. (By the way, I feel quite similarly about the treatment of the military in Transformers. I have all the healthy suspicion of military power that any citizen of a republic should, but come on, give the guys some credit for professionalism.)
    • I liked the bribery-by-pizza. How could the guard have resisted?
    • Oh, awkward stuff like “The General” being Dr. Ross’s dad drives me crazy. Is that what soap operas are like?
    • I enjoyed the surprisingly artistic contrast between the big, explosive battle scenes about Bruce Banner the Hulk, and the subtle, even tender personal scenes about Bruce Banner the man. Nice job.

    So, to conclude I say it was an interesting film set in interesting locales that explored some interesting ideas about human nature from a unique angle, yet it was hamstrung by some clumsy writing. It’s probably worth a dollar at the dollar theater. Better yet, it’s definitely worth zero dollars at the dollar theater. Thanks my FOAF benefactor!
    – Josh

  • Boko Maru

    At a jazz festival I once heard a band called Boko Maru. They were really fun to see, and I’d like to hear their music again. Yet the band seems to have ceased to be quite a while ago. (See this archived version of their old web page and this review.) So here’s a request: to anybody who has a copy of Boko Maru’s sole album, Dreamland, I ask you to upload it to imeem so as to give Boko Maru a second life. That would make me glad 🙂

    By the way, ever since seeing Boko Maru, often when I see a bag of Coco Roos it makes me think of them. Boco Maroos? Now that would be a sweet breakfast!

  • Conflicting Views of Georgia

    I’m not sure who out there has been paying attention to this when they could be watching Michael Phelps swim, but a conflict has arisen between Georgia (the country, not the US state) and Russia over a separatist region known as South Ossetia (technically part of Georgia, though in essence independent.) Here are a few notable links:

    • Thomas Barnett seems to have a moderate view of what went on / is going on in Georgia/South Ossetia/Abkhazia here, essentially concluding that Georgia was the original aggressor, if I read him right. He descends into a bit of military-speak, but I think the Core and Gap ideas are fairly intuitive.
    • A debate in which a Mr. O’Sullivan offers the theory that Russia baited Georgia into action lies here.
    • Russia Blog seems solid on insisting that the right questions get answered, or at least investigated, here.

    Honestly, I’m quite confused and am not sure which side to believe. On the surface the “Russia baited Georgia” theory has a conspiracy theory feel to it, immediately inclining me to reject it. In principle, though, it is possible. Even if we did know what happened, a good evaluation of its significance is complicated by the fact that, while South Ossetia is de jure part of Georgia, it has for over a decade been de facto independent. So, whatever Georgia’s motives for attacking S. Ossetia, it will attempt to hide be hind the de jure rather than the de facto version of things. It seems that the rest of the world have done Georgia a disservice by allowing these separatist issues to remain unresolved, thus providing a situation that would tempt Georgia to violent action.