Category Archives: foreign affairs/human rights

The crisis in Ukraine—a few thoughts

The Internet is rife with Russian propaganda and disinformation campaigns. In any comment section on any platform, you’ll see the trolls.

I’m posting this video from my tiny little blog, to do my part against that wave.

It is stunning that anyone could hear such eloquent pleas for peace, and not back down.

The cynicism and dehumanization of the other necessary to do so, while simultaneously proclaiming that other to be “one” with you… it must have been a cruel life to lead someone there.

I pity Vladimir Putin. It is only the fog of state media propaganda that protects him from his own people.

Wherever there is sunlight, like a vampire he will burn.

And so he lives increasingly in the dark, unhinged, controlled by the delusion that somehow, ruining the future will make up for the disasters of the past.

It is hard to pierce the veil of selective coverage and outright lies. Our own media has failed us so often. Our own biases.

But no matter how I spin it, no matter the affordances I try to make for differing worldviews and values, I simply see no justification for this invasion. This isn’t a game of Risk, with its little plastic figurines. Forty-four million lives are on the line, if not far more.

In the early years of this blog, I posted my concerns about Russia’s interference in Ukraine’s internal affairs, and about increasing autocracy in Russia.

It is interesting to see seeds planted decades ago bearing bitter fruit. Not that I was any prophet.

Just the other day I was thinking to myself, Too bad I didn’t study Mandarin instead of Russian, probably would have been more useful….

But I guess if we’re going to have another cold war, those Russian classes feel like a better choice in retrospect.

In my early twenties I was fortunate enough to heed somebody’s recommendation that I read The GULAG Archipelago. (I just received two volumes of it that I was missing as a birthday present from my sister.) It was an astounding book—Solzhenitsyn’s account of the cruelties of the Soviet prison camp system never left me. It seems more and more that the system that produced those atrocities never fully reformed; the tsarist court and the Politburo are still with us in their way.

We are fortunate in western countries that, with our many and manifold failings, we do have long histories of democracy. We look back to, say, the U.S. Constitution in 1789, or the Iroquois Confederacy, or British traditions of parliamentary supremacy, or the Magna Carta in 1215.

Russians look back in their history and see a long line of authoritarians, with the occasional benevolent dictator. For every Peter there’s an Ivan. For every Alexander, there’s a Josef Stalin. Russian Empire, Soviet Union, Russian Federation… it’s all the same.

Such a natural thing then to fall into yet another cult of personality, to be led along once more on the road of conquest.

Let’s do what we must to keep our commitments, equip our friends, and defend our allies.

Like the last Cold War… this too, eventually, shall pass.

Wireless Mesh Networking As An Agent of Political Subversion

Just putting this out there as a ‘ping’ to see if anybody else has thought about this. A recent post at One Free Korea inspired an interesting thought. The general idea is that wireless mesh networking technology being developed and deployed these days seems like an ideal foundation for a dissident network disseminating information in oppressed societies such as North Korea, Myanmar, Cuba, and others. Because discovery of a node by government authorities would almost definitely have severe consequences for the node operator, it’s important that node operators be hard to track down.

Network desiderata:

  • Secure. Broadcasts must somehow be kept from prying government eyes. If activists plan an anti-government protest on compromised channels, the government will know exactly where and when to place riot police to shut it down. So security is essential. This means encryption, but it also means security at the human level. Before admitting a node to the mesh, appropriate measures should be taken to ensure it isn’t a government-sponsored infiltration attempt.
  • Opportunistic. Nodes know when they’re close to other nodes and take advantage of the opportunity to send and receive messages, within constraints.
  • Minimalistic. It’s important to maximize distribution of messages while minimizing the number of nodes each individual node is aware of. This achieves a sort of compartmentalization of information, which at least makes it more difficult for authorities to track down the rest of the network should one of the nodes be compromised.
  • Defensive. Should a node be compromised, measures should be taken to contain the damage. If the owner of the node is able, he can send a special broadcast alerting its neighbors to take precautions. Such precautions might include destroying or hiding of hardware, fleeing so as to avoid interrogation, etc. The alert could be forwarded to as much of the network as possible, prompting radio silence and reorganization of the network to isolate the security breech (moving the neighbors of the compromised node from the center of the mesh out to its periphery where they would do less damage if they, too, were compromised.)
  • Smart. If node A has already sent message 1 to node B, it should never send that message again.
  • Concise. The less time spent actually sending out data, the less the chances of being discovered by means of triangulation. Messages should use a minimal amount of broadcast to send a maximal amount of information. This means compression, and sending of mainly text as opposed to images, audio, or video (though these could have their place).
  • Intermittent. Messages need to be queued rather than being sent ahead immediately. If a node is silent most of the time and only broadcasts occasionally, it’s less likely to be discovered.
  • Location-Unpredictable. A node operator who always broadcasts from the same location is more likely to be discovered, so nodes should be able to broadcast from different locations, reducing the likelihood of discovery.

Hardware characteristics:

  • Cheap. At least, cheap enough to be fairly widely deployed.
  • Mobile. Totalitarian regimes tend to deny their citizens freedom of movement, so when people do move, the network should take advantage of the opportunity provided to transfer information from one connected component to another. For example, suppose a Pyongyang resident were to visit Hamhung. The network nodes in Hamhung, being disconnected from those in Pyongyang, would not have received communications sent by Pyongyang nodes. But the visitor node, acting as an intermediary, could transmit the Pyongyang broadcasts to the Hamhung nodes.
  • Variable range. Never broadcast at higher power than necessary, yet be able to send very-long-range communications if needed.
  • (Depending on availability of electricity) Low power.
  • Ample storage. If two different connected components remain totally separated for years, a visitor node needs to be able to bring as many broadcasts with it as possible when it reconnects them.

Software characteristics:

  • Localized. People should be able to easily enter messages in their own language and (hopefully) writing system.

One of the key outstanding issues would be how such a mesh would be formed to begin with, given that the target population wouldn’t have many other channels by which to coordinate the setup.

The main objectives of a network like this would be to enable political mobilization by otherwise-oppressed peoples; to provide information about the nature of the oppressive regime through grass-roots news reports, commentaries, etc.; and to provide a connection to the world beyond the nation’s borders. It would be extremely dangerous to deploy such a thing. People would be caught and executed for participating. But the long-run potential payoff of providing free and uncensored information flows could be immense: the liberation of an entire people—intellectually, spiritually, politically, physically, economically, culturally.