Category: everything else

  • City water caused my acid reflux; filtering eliminates it

    City water caused my acid reflux; filtering eliminates it

    For over a decade I’ve had on-and-off heartburn. But mostly it was no big deal—just one of those discontents of modernity—until a few years ago, when out of nowhere I started to have acid reflux.

    Not just any acid reflux—it was nasty. I’d wake up with pains shooting through my entire body. Or not be able to fall asleep at all. I’d have to sit up completely upright, and sometimes wait a bit, for it to subside.

    I was really worried about it. I’d go running and seemed to feel my damaged esophagus as I ran. In the spring I scheduled an appointment for an esophagogastroduodenoscopy—for a gastroenterologist to send a camera down my throat to see what was going on.

    But then I took a trip to Mexico. And, as one does in Mexico, while there I drank only bottled water.

    After the first few days I noticed that I had no acid reflux. For the rest of my two weeks there I had no reflux. It was very noticeable.

    When I got back to Seattle, I cancelled the endoscopy appointment. It was clear that some difference between my life in the U.S. and how I lived in Mexico for a few weeks was causing my reflux.

    At first I tried to keep as many things as I could the same. I ate Mexican food; I drank water out of large bottles like the garrafones used in Mexico; I slept on the couch instead of in my bed.

    Over time I returned to my more usual cuisine. And I started sleeping in my bed again. No reflux. I switched from bottled water to filtered water. No reflux.

    Except… I still did have occasional nights. Like one night in a month.

    And I’ve realized that it always correlates to when I drink water from a source I don’t know is filtered, such as water from a cafe, or times when I’ve cooked using tap water.

    When I cooked using filtered water, I had no issues.

    That convinced me: it’s the water.

    Seattle’s water comes from the Cedar River and, according to Seattle Public Utilities, is treated thus:

    • Screened to remove debris
    • Chlorinated to remove microbial contaminants, such as bacteria and viruses
    • Fluoridated for dental health protection
    • Ozonated for odor and taste improvements and Giardia control
    • Disinfected with ultraviolet light to disable microbial contaminants such as chlorine-resistant Cryptosporidium
    • Supplemented with lime for pH adjusted corrosion control to minimize lead leaching in older plumbing systems.

    One of these treatments is likely what my body is reacting to. And it’s almost certainly the chlorination: not only do I clearly smell the chlorine in the water, but my Brita filter is capable of removing it, but not fluoride.

    One anomaly is that cooking with tap water seems to cause the reflux. Seattle City Utilities say they chlorinate with “‘free chlorine’”, as opposed to chloramines, so in theory it should be removable by boiling.

    I suppose the rate of degassing of chlorine while boiling lentils is a question as yet unexplored by science. Or perhaps the chlorine remains dissolved in water absorbed by the legumes.

    Another possibility is that it is not the chlorine itself, but one of the many hundreds of possible disinfection byproducts, or perhaps another contaminant also removed by an activated charcoal filter (or by sitting in a filter pitcher for hours) that is causing my reflux.

    But for now, I’m glad to have found a way to eliminate this terrible problem. It hung like a cloud over my life, and to find a resolution to it has been a wonderful thing. That’s why I find myself writing about my digestive woes on my blog: to share what has been a revolution in my health, and such a simple thing, in case it helps someone else.

  • Three reforms

    1. All federal elected officials must convert the entirety of the personal and family wealth into U.S. Treasury bonds for the duration of their term of service plus ten years.
    2. The tax rate of a corporation is equal to its market share.
    3. The tax rate of individuals and families is increased by 1% (multiplied by 1.01) each year in times of deficit, and decreased by 1% (multiplied by 0.99) each year in times of surplus; with the exception that a surplus of up to 5% of GDP will first be applied to early repayment of the national debt, in which case a tax decrease will not be triggered unless the surplus exceeds 5% of GDP.
  • Depolarization as a spiritual path

    I have studied and decried political polarization in the United States for many years.

    Congress, which should be the key site for synthesizing disparate viewpoints from across the country, is instead largely following trends established by rival media echo-chambers. The polarization is materially impairing our ability to govern ourselves effectively.

    These competing media worlds have an incentive to not agree, to maximize conflict in order to maximize viewership. “Rage to engage” is the idea.

    Allowing the most democratic house of the most democratic branch of our government to atrophy is not acceptable and could have dire consequences going forward.

    What is to be done?

    There may be key reforms that could move us in a direction where engagement is promoted and polarization is discouraged. Things like non-partisan primaries carried out using ranked-choice voting and alternate funding models for news outlets.

    But the rejuvenation of our liberal democracy must be a cultural as well as a political change.

    Fortunately, the very intensity of the polarization is what makes engaging it a powerful path forward.

    The polarization is the locus of great cultural and political energy, and will be our greatest asset if only we can get the different sides of the argument to deeply engage each other.

    This will happen bottom-up: we can each do this in our own lives, without permission. An ideological rival is a resource like no other, relentlessly pointing out the flaws in arguments, the overlooked, the bad assumptions; who wishes to can learn much this way.

    To renew our liberal democracy, we must practice liberalism and democracy in our own lives: if our culture is imbued with it, our government inevitably will be, too.

    Talk with, befriend, if possible live amongst, those you disagree with. Love them more than you may dislike their views. Be humble. You can learn from anyone.

    This is easier said than done. For those deeply invested in an echo-chamber identity, encountering other views of the world can feel deeply threatening.

    That’s why depolarization is a spiritual path. It is a path for self-growth, by challenging your assumptions. By requiring you to defend, or even modify, your beliefs in the light of new challenges and, ideally, new evidence.

    Depolarization is not for the complacent. But it is for those who are tired of feeling angry all the time; of seeing their fellow Americans as enemies; of feeling comfortable only with a certain crowd with whom they already agree. If you’re ready to live a bigger life, to open your heart wider than you ever thought it could, then you must encounter, and engage with, that which triggers you.

    It’s my belief that over time everyone who does this will come to see how what they once regarded as “other” was already a part of them; how hate for that “other” was hate for themselves; how the “other” has the answers to problems they once saw as insurmountable; and how love for themselves and for others is, in the end, the same thing.